Dear ActivityPub + Github + Matrix users : do you have any ideas on how we could bridge these three tools ? Bouncing the following tools https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/t/matrix-bridges-ecosystem-tools-vs-activitypub/106 in the context of FedeProxy (forge activitypub interoperability)
github + matrix bridge + kazarma + activitypub client (mastodon for example) = what usage ? following issues ?
@arthurlutz Microsoft will never accept so, for Github, it's over. Why not working with Gitlab and Gitea to add federation, instead?
@bortzmeyer I'm asking with github as an example, but obviously gitlab & gitea are in the target forges for fedeproxy & forgefed. The two approaches (core implementation & implementing a bridge) are being explored I believe. The bridge approach is more pragmatic for proprietary solutions such as github. See the forum for more info about all this.
The joining itself is nothing more than the creation of the section + a related group that allow the project team to moderate it themselves.
But implicitly there's the commitment to be intricate part of the community that collectively drives the technology foundation of the Fediverse towards the future. I.e. dedicated to evolving open standards and tighter interoperability.
(In other words: Just having it there as an advertisement, while never engaging, would be dishonest)
@dragnucs I used github as a example since it's a proprietary solution with quite a lot of projects there. For gitlab you can checkout the issues collected about what is being done and discussed on the forum https://forum.fedeproxy.eu/t/federated-gitlab-6468-issues-gitlab-org-gitlab/83 Feel free to express your use cases there or upstream !
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!